Suburban Diva

Living a glamorous life without the paparazzi.

My Chloe Inspired Flats February 19, 2007

Filed under: Fashion, Shopping — suburbandiva @ 5:30 pm

I love the design label Chloe, but considering the purses typically cost just a few hundred shy of my mortgage, I don’t buy. I adored all things Paddington when the bag was the hype, finding the shoes equally lovable. Well boy was I a happy camper to find Franco Sarto’s Oggi flat. It’s definitely a throwback to the Paddington flat. And at $44.99 on sale, I consider it a steal. I bought them in black, but am considering returning for white and beige–which were even cheaper. I found them at Famous Footwear. I had never been into one before. I’m adding it to my hit list when I’m in the mood to do some retail therapy.

Chloe Paddington Flat
Chloe Paddington ballerina flat, which retailed for $500 and above when they were available.

Franco Sarto Oggi flat
Franco Sarto Oggi ballerina flat, <$50.

 

Payless Haute Couture? February 19, 2007

Filed under: Fashion, Shopping — suburbandiva @ 11:20 am

I had no idea how fashionable Payless is becoming until I saw an article in the Jan 2007 issue of InStyle. Abaete for Payless was listed as a great brand at a reasonable price, but when I checked the shoes out for myself, I wasn’t smitten. Then I caught some coverage of lines to be opened at Payless during NY fashion week. Another designer has teamed up with Payless, Lela Rose. And the designs are cute! My favorites are the Chancery peep toe pump and the Finsbury platform pump. They can be viewed at Payless’s site. The fall line from Abaete is also up for preview, and the spring shoes from Abaeta are already in the online store. The real test will be wearing a pair to work one day, but I suppose that post will have to wait until fall.

 

All the Buzz About Target February 19, 2007

Filed under: Fashion, Shopping — suburbandiva @ 11:16 am

After reading the hype for Proenza Schouler’s new line at Target, I went to check it out for myself. My goal was to update my wardrobe with some trendy pieces to fit the new looks of spring without breaking the bank. I came back with three tops from Tar-JAY, two from Proenza’s line. I’ve assembled them into outfits to reflect the looks of spring 2007.

The first outfit features a red and white striped, long sleeve tissue tee from the Proenza Schouler line. It was $16.99. I paired it with my wide-legged trousers from anthropolgie and peep toe wedges from Franco Sarto. I saw a similar look on Gwen Stefani in InStyle or Vogue and thought it was cute and comfy looking. I might be daring enough to try the red lipstick . . .

The bright green shirt in outfit two was a $14.99 Target buy, also from the Proenza Schouler line. I have it with my RL dark blue jeans and two other trendy pieces I picked up for the season, a red patent leather handbag of Steve Madden’s from last season (on sale at Ross) and Dollhouse zebra print ballet flats (also at Ross).

My attempt at incorporating nautical influences and my love for stripes created the third outfit. I picked up the blue and white striped shirt, which has puffy 3/4 sleeves at TJ Maxx a couple of weeks ago. I like it with this red skirt from anthropologie and a pair of gold ballet flats from Chinese Laundry (also from last season a la Ross). I have admired the cropped cardigan look for some time now, but never really thought I could pull it off. When I saw an inexpensive Mossimo Red white cropped cardigan, I decided to pick it up as a third trendy piece. The quality of the fabric is nothing to write about, but for $20 it made a decent addition to my attempts to jazz up my casual wardrobe.

img_0495.jpg img_0498.jpg img_0501.jpg

Now that I know that there is truth behind the hype, I will watch more carefully for the debut of the next designers. It’s only been a few days that my local Target has offered the pieces and the pickings are already slim.

 

Nars Orgasm and CG Cheekers Rose Silk February 19, 2007

Filed under: Beauty, Reviews — suburbandiva @ 10:36 am

Blushes

Nars Orgasm            CG Cheekers Rose Silk

Yup, the photo confirms it. These products are nearly exact in color.

 

Product Review: A Cover Girl Make Over February 19, 2007

Filed under: Beauty, Reviews — suburbandiva @ 3:14 am

Vogue February 2007

When I opened up the February issue of Vogue, I was excited to read that all of Zellweger’s make up was Cover Girl. I’m sure there was some product placement going on, but I figure that if a makeup artist can make drugstore makeup work for a Vogue photo shoot, it is worth trying out. I wasn’t able to find all of the products used, but I did pick up the TruBlend Whipped Foundation in creamy natural, the Cheekers blush in rose silk, the Professional loose powder in fair, and the VolumeExact mascara in brown. My coloring is very similar to Zellweger’s, so I bought the exact products that were credited.

I have had more breakouts recently and was becoming dissatisfied with the coverage I was getting from the i.d. bare minerals line. It is such a nice, natural look, but somedays I need more to cover up the redness. The TruBlend Whipped definitely adds a thicker layer. Because it is so thick, I’ve only been using it in problem areas. I’ve applied it around the eyes, around the nostrils, and over the breakouts. I’m using a brush to apply to these areas and then blending outward. I like the look overall and the color is nice for my tone.

The Cheekers blush has worked well, although Cover Girl blush has always smelled funny to me. Very chemically and kind of nauseating. Not sure why I notice this, but I can’t apply it without taking note. The color is peachy enough that it is reminiscent to me of my Nars Orgasm blush, the famed ubiquitous blush that is supposed to look good on any skin tone. In fact, when I compare the two side by side, the colors are nearly identical. Nars has a bit more golden flecks than the CG one, but that is the only difference visible to the eye. Out of curiousity I tested Orgasm on one cheeck and Rose Silk on the other. I can’t see the difference. (Although I can smell it! What is it with that stink?!) Nars Orgasm runs $25 at Sephora.com, while CG Cheekers in Rose Silk is $3.39 at drugstore.com. I think the yucky smell of the package is worth the savings.

I had never purchased a just brown mascara before. I have a very dark brownish black that I used for a while, but usually I stick to black. I know people advise it for light hair and fair tones, but I am happy to see my eyes pop with black mascara. But I wanted to follow the make up look as close as possible, so I went ahead and bought the brown. Besides, I already have so many mascaras I couldn’t really justify buying another one unless it was in a different color. I wasn’t able to find the soft brown CG smoothers or the Petal shine lip stick also used on the cover, so I improvised with my own brown mascara from Clinique and a pink tone sheer lippy. I am happy to have experimented with the brown mascara combined with the brown eye liner, as it is used on the cover. It provides a very natural look to my everyday make up. But it is a look of its own; I do not like the brown mascara with color on my lids. A few days later, as I was playing around with the brown mascara, I threw on a light lavendar shadow. It didn’t work. As far as the texture and wand is concerned, the mascara is great. It provides a very even, nonclumping application. I don’t feel that it adds much in length, but that could also be from using brown as opposed to black.

I am still a novice when it comes to loose powder. I bought the CG Professional loose powder because I don’t really have any aside from what I’ve been using with i.d. bare minerals, and I wanted to follow the look exactly as prescribed in the magazine. So when I finish my look, I applied the powder. I don’t feel the look is more finished. I can’t really say that it makes my make up last longer, although that is a possibility. I don’t really get the whole powder-finish thing. I’ve been doing it out of obligation and because Bobbi Brown Beauty said to.

Pictures of my Nars Orgasm next to CG Cheekers Rose Silk to come.